Creation Bits

This blog has been superceded, and is only here for archive purposes. The latest blog posts, depending on topic, can be found at one of the blogs at the new location!

These are very uneditted and underthought ideas that I get while debating the creation/evolution debate. This is the more-often-updated but less-thought-out version of the crevo blog.

Monday, November 28, 2005

Cell Biology International takes 20 years to catch up with CRSQ

It's funny how many times I've heard evolutionists shout "where is the peer-reviewed material" and make fun of creationist peer-reviewed journals like TJ and CRSQ. Then, along comes Cell Biology International to make the exact same arguments creationists have made for decades.

I think this is just the beginning. It will take some time for the dam to break, but when it does, you'll see a very different view of biology. The authors in this article are still cowering behind ambiguous phrases such as that science should "press forward with new research approaches which are not obvious at this time". In other words, they think that we should consider an Intelligent Design scenario, but are to afraid of the Darwinists to actually say so. If they actually came out and said it the editors will stop publishing their papers, or be subject to castigation a la Sternberg.

Anyway, I have heard Darwinists over and over again say that all these arguments are invalid, and here now it is peer-reviewed material in 2004.

I suggest that everyone do an inter-library loan request for the paper. It has a _lot_ of arguments against a materialistic origin-of-life scenarios, any one of them are pretty devastating.

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?